Effect of a training intervention on the integration of Computational Thinking in Primary Education Teachers

Effect of a training intervention on the integration of Computational Thinking in Primary Education Teachers

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17471877

Keywords:

Intervention Programs, Elementary School Teachers, Computational Thinking, Visual Block Programming

Abstract

Computational thinking (CT) is a key competence in the 21st century. Its teaching in Primary Education combines unplugged and plugged-in strategies. The present study evaluates the effect of a training intervention aimed at primary school teachers to develop CT and implement visual block programming (VBP). A quasi-experimental pre-post design was used to assess the effects of the intervention. The final sample consisted of 57 teachers in Spain. The AProPrim scale was used for the measurement, consisting of three dimensions (self-efficacy, relevance and interest), whose structure was confirmed by confirmatory factor analysis. Data analysis was performed with IBM SPSS, applying descriptive statistics, Student's t-tests, Wilcoxon for non-parametric data and Pearson's correlations. The results showed a significant increase in self-efficacy and perceived knowledge and use of VBP, although a decrease in interest was observed. Positive correlations were found between self-efficacy, relevance and use, which were strengthened after the intervention. In addition, the overall assessment of the training was positive, highlighting its applicability and the demand for more sessions. The implications of this study highlight the importance of providing specific teacher training in CT and VBP to improve self-efficacy and the application of these competencies in the classroom, primarily through practical approaches and appropriate resources. It is recommended that training strategies be adjusted according to teacher experience, considering generational differences.

References

Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2020). Developing young children’s computational thinking with educational robotics: An interaction effect between gender and scaffolding strategy. Computers in Human Behavior, 105, 105954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.03.018

Authors. (2024).

Authors. (2026).

Avcı, C., & Deniz, M. N. (2022). Computational thinking: early childhood teachers’ and prospective teachers’ preconceptions and self-efficacy. Education and Information Technologies, 27(8), 11689–11713. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11078-5

Bakala, E., Gerosa, A., Hourcade, J. P., & Tejera, G. (2021). Preschool children, robots, and computational thinking: A systematic review. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 29, 100337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2021.100337

Basu, S., Rutstein, D. W., Xu, Y., Wang, H., & Shear, L. (2021). A principled approach to designing computational thinking concepts and practices assessments for upper elementary grades. Computer Science Education, 31(2), 169–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2020.1866939

Berciano-Alcaraz, A., Salgado-Somoza, M., & Jiménez-Gestal, C. (2022). Alfabetización computacional en educación infantil: Dificultades y beneficios en el aula de 3 años. Revista Electrónica Educare, 26(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.15359/ree.26-2.15

Bocconi, S., Chioccariello, A., Kampylis, P., Dagiené, V., Wastiau, P., Engelhardt, K., Earp, J., Horvath, M., Jasuté, E., Malagoli, C., Masiulionyté-Dangiené, V., & Stupuriené, G. (2022). Reviewing Computational Thinking in Compulsory Education. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/126955

Boletín Oficial del Estado [BOE]. (2020). Ley Orgánica 3/2020, de 29 de diciembre, por la que se modifica la Ley Orgánica 2/2006, de 3 de mayo, de Educación. Boletín Oficial del Estado, 340, de 30 de diciembre de 2020. https://bit.ly/46iano7

Brackmann, C. P., Román-González, M., Robles, G., Moreno-León, J., Casali, A., & Barone, D. (2017). Development of Computational Thinking Skills through Unplugged Activities in Primary School. Proceedings of the 12th workshop on primary and secondary computing education, WiPSCE '17, 65–72. https://doi.org/10.1145/3137065.3137069

Cheng, Y.-P., Lai, C.-F., Chen, Y.-T., Wang, W.-S., Huang, Y.-M., & Wu, T.-T. (2023). Enhancing student’s computational thinking skills with student-generated questions strategy in a game-based learning platform. Computers & Education, 200, 104794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104794

Cho, G., Hwang, H., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2020). Cutoff criteria for overall model fit indexes in generalized structured component analysis. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 8(4), 189–202. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-020-00089-1

Çimşir, S., Kalelıoğlu, F., & Gülbahar, Y. (2024). Perceptions of primary school teachers on interdisciplinary computational thinking skills training. Informatics in Education 23(3), 507–524. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2024.16

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Collado-Sánchez, M., García-Peñalvo, F., y Llorente, A. (2021). Computational thinking competences training for primary education teachers. TEEM’21 Ninth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM'21), 758–762. https://doi.org/10.1145/3486011.3486544

Del Olmo-Muñoz, J., Cózar-Gutiérrez, R., & González-Calero, J. A. (2020). Computational thinking through unplugged activities in early years of Primary Education. Computers & Education, 150, 103832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103832

Demirkol, K., Kartal, B., & Taşdemir, A. (2022). The effect of teachers’ attitudes towards and self-efficacy beliefs regarding STEM education on students’ STEM career interests. Journal of Science Learning, 5(2), 204–216. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v5i2.43991

Fagerlund, J., Leino, K., Kiuru, N., & Niilo-Rämä, M. (2022). Finnish teachers’ and students’ programming motivation and their role in teaching and learning computational thinking. Frontiers in Education, 7, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.948783

Ferrando, P. J., & Anguiano-Carrasco, C. (2010). El análisis factorial como técnica de investigación en psicología. Papeles del Psicólogo, 3(1), 18–23. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=77812441003

Gamito, R., Aristizabal, P., Basasoro, M., & León, I. (2022). El desarrollo del pensamiento computacional en educación: valoración basada en una experiencia con Scratch. Innoeduca. International Journal of Technology and Educational Innovation, 8(1), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.24310/innoeduca.2022.v8i1.12093

García-Jiménez, E., Gil Flores, J., & Rodríguez-Gómez, G. (2000). Análisis Factorial. La Muralla, S.A.

Jiang, H., Islam, A. Y. M. A., Gu, X., & Guan, J. (2023). How do thinking styles and STEM attitudes have effects on computational thinking? A structural equation modeling analysis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 61(3), 645–673. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21899

Kallia, M., & Cutts, Q. (2022). Conceptual development in early-years computing education: a grounded cognition and action based conceptual framework. Computer Science Education, 33(4), 485–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2022.2140527

Kotsopoulos, D., Floyd, L., Khan, S., Kizito N. I., Somanath, S., Weber J., & Yiu C. (2017). A pedagogical framework for computational thinking. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education 3, 154–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-017-0031-2

Liu, J., Li, Q., Sun, X., Zhu, Z., & Xu, Y. (2021). Factors influencing programming self-efficacy: an empirical study in the context of Mainland China. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 43(3), 835–849. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2021.1985430

Marchesi, A. (2004). Qué será de nosotros los malos alumnos. Alianza Ensayo

Montero, I., y León, O. G. (2007). A guide for naming research studies in psychology. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 7 (3), 847-862.

Nordlöf, C., Höst, G. E., & Hallström, J. (2017). Swedish technology teachers’ attitudes to their subject and its teaching. Research in Science & Technological Education, 35(2), 195–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2017.1295368

Ortuño M., G., & Serrano, J. L. (2024). Implementación y formación del profesorado de educación primaria en pensamiento computacional: una revisión sistemática. RIED-Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 27(1), 255–287. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.27.1.37572

Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms. Children, computers and powerful ideas. Basic books.

Pérez-Calderón, E., Prieto-Ballester, J., & Miguel-Barrado, V. (2021). Analysis of digital competence for Spanish teachers at pre-university educational key stages during COVID-19. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(15), 8093. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18158093

Pérez-Garcias, A., Darder Mesquida, A., de-Benito Crosetti, B., & Negre-Bennasar, F. (2024). La competencia digital y la agencia digital docente en la formación inicial del profesorado. Bordón. Revista de Pedagogía, 76(2), 27–44. https://doi.org/10.13042/Bordon.2024.100546

Rich, P. J., Larsen, R. A., & Mason, S. L. (2020). Measuring teacher beliefs about coding and computational thinking. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 53(3), 296–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1771232

Rodrigues, R. N., Costa, C., & Martins, F. (2024). Integration of computational thinking in initial teacher training for primary schools: a systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1330065. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1330065

Ronan, D., Erdil, D. C., & Brylow, D. (2023). Teacher attitudes & beliefs in computer science (T-ABC): Development & validation of a teacher survey instrument. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 23(2), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3569945

Sun, L., & Liu, J. (2024). Different programming approaches on primary students’ computational thinking: A multifactorial chain mediation effect. Educational technology research and development, 72(2), 557–584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10312-2

Sun, L., & Zhou, D. (2023). K-12 teachers' programming attitudes among different disciplines: Analysis of influential factors. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(2), 375–930. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12895

Tsortanidou, X., Daradoumis, T., & Barberá-Gregori, E. (2023). Unplugged computational thinking at K-6 education: evidence from a multiple-case study in Spain. Education 3-13, 51(6), 948–965. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2022.2029924

Toh, L. P. E., Causo, A., Tzuo, P. W., Chen, I. M., & Yeo, S. H. (2016). A Review on the Use of Robots in Education and Young Children. Educational Technology & Society, 19 (2), 148–163. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/190767/

Villalustre, L., & Cueli, M. (2023). Assessing the computational thinking of pre-service teachers: A gender and robotics programming experience analysis. Education Sciences, 13, Article 1032. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13101032

Wijnen, F., Molen, J. W. v. d., & Voogt, J. (2022). Primary teachers’ attitudes towards using new technology and stimulating higher-order thinking in students: a profile analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 28(6), 6347–6372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11413-w

Wijnen, F., Walma Van Der Molen, J., & Voogt, J. (2024). Measuring primary school teachers’ attitudes towards new technology use: development and validation of the TANT questionnaire. SN Social Sciences, 4, Article 32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-024-00836-6

Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational Thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215

Yadav, A., Mayfield, C., Zhou, N., Hambrusch, S., & Korb, J. T. (2014). Computational Thinking in Elementary and Secondary Teacher Education. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 14(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/2576872

Zapata-Cáceres, M., Marcelino, P., El-Hamamsy, L., & Martín-Barroso, E. (2024). A Bebras Computational Thinking (ABC-Thinking) program for primary school: Evaluation using the competent computational thinking test. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 4969–14998. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12441-w

Published

2025-10-29

How to Cite

Gonzalez Cervera, A., González-Arechavala, Y., & Martín-Carrasquilla, O. (2025). Effect of a training intervention on the integration of Computational Thinking in Primary Education Teachers: Effect of a training intervention on the integration of Computational Thinking in Primary Education Teachers. International Journal of Education and Science Research, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17471877

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.